Analysis: What’s at stake in the Apple-Psystar case
Macworld —
... does business in the iPod division. “Certainly, Apple has the right to say what you can do with their software, but each one of those license agreements would have to be challenged individually,” said Baker. The basis of the copyright misuse claim brought by Psystar is that Apple is extending the enforceability of the copyright beyond the protection allowed under the law by illegally tying the operating system and hardware together. Mark Bartholomew, an associate law professor at State University of New York, Buffalo , points out that antitrust laws and copyright misuse laws ...
Pystar vs Apple Inc
MacBytes.com —
... does business in the iPod division. "Certainly, Apple has the right to say what you can do with their software, but each one of those license agreements would have to be challenged individually," said Baker. The basis of the copyright misuse claim brought by Psystar is that Apple is extending the enforceability of the copyright beyond the protection allowed under the law by illegally tying the operating system and hardware together. Mark Bartholomew, an associate law professor at State University of New York, Buffalo , points out that antitrust laws and copyright misuse laws ...
